| Minister Mthethwa clarifies SAPS appeal on Tatane matter | |
|---|---|
| Date Published: | 2013/03/30 |
| Description Details: | |
|
Media Statement
30 March 2013 PRETORIA: - The Minister of Police, Nathi Mthethwa
wishes to correct some of the recent media reports about the South African
Police Service (SAPS) appeal to the South African Human Rights Commission
(SAHRC) following the Ficksburg service delivery protest, which resulted in Mr
Andries Tatane's death. There is an appeal document
that was lodged internally by the South African Police Service (SAPS) with the
SAHRC and the Minister of Police is named as the appellant in this
appeal. This appeal was filed on 14 February 2013 but the decision was
taken in December 2012 to lodge this appeal, precisely because issues such as
crowd control, policing of public protests are operational functions which are
implemented by the department, not the Ministry. Nonetheless, there has been
some misrepresentation in the media reports about this issue, more so as the
reporting is wrongly linked to the court's decision on the case this week,
where the accused were acquitted. The focus of the appeal is not with
regard to the findings themselves or the merits of the case, as has been widely
and incorrectly reported this week. The appeal sought to
clarify SAPS' willingness to cooperate with SAHRC process however because the
matter was before both criminal and civil courts, SAPS needed to respect these
pending court processes. What the appeal mainly focuses on are the SAHRC
recommendations, particularly in effectively managing public protests. SAPS have argued that
processes had already been in place to deal with these recommendations, in so
far as they related to improvements around crowd control measures, systems and
protocols. To this end, SAPS had further argued that they had not had an
opportunity to have sight and respond to the entire complaint. In the appeal SAPS asked
that the report be set aside or it be referred back for further investigation
so that they could have an opportunity to make representations or that the investigation
be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the criminal case. The Minister and SAPS have
absolute respect for all Chapter 9 institutions and would continue to cooperate
on any matter that is brought before them, however cautions against any
misrepresentations of facts by those who make uninformed public commentary, to
kindly exercise prudence. -End- Media Enquiries:
| |
| Attachments: | |